
Fincher’s Lisbeth is not Larsson’s. She is sexualized, softened, romanticized, and less empowered. Whether he intended this or not, it’s what countless critics see in the film; they don’t mind it – in fact most like it – but they’ve recognized it and have written about it.
There seems to be a relief that Mara’s Salander is a more relatable person, that classic “female” tropes like softness and vulnerability are visible. It speaks to society’s overwhelming discomfort with the unclassifiable, whether it’s a person’s sexuality, a terrible people who does good things, or the motivations of a young woman who has been horrifically mistreated, mentally and physically, for decades.
" —Monika Bartyzek, Girls on Film: Softening and Sexualizing Lisbeth Salander [x] (via congratu-welldone)
(via charethcutestory)
(via thequietworld)
gonna have to agree with the article here and NOT the tags. yeesh. i honestly think that lisbeth is vulnerable at times...
#i know that gwtdt can be problematic but this dumb #i hate that this person is saying that vulnerability = female = bad...
#i know that gwtdt can be problematic but this dumb #i hate that this person is saying that vulnerability = female = bad...
#this article is ridiculous #did this person even read the books #lisbeth does have many moments of sweetness and...